Skillman Resident Raises Concerns Over Septic Fees at Board of Health Meeting

Nicholas Mistretta

Montgomery Township — Skillman resident Michel Parise raised concerns regarding the township’s septic system fee structure during the public comment portion of the April 8 Board of Health meeting, calling for greater transparency and a review of the existing policy.

Addressing the board, Parise questioned the fairness and purpose of the township’s recurring septic system administrative fee, which is assessed to certain homeowners with private septic systems. 

Parise stated that while some homeowners are required to pay the fee and submit proof of septic maintenance, others appear to be exempt from the program. She described the situation as inconsistent, noting that “some people are paying and some people are not,” and questioned whether such a structure is equitable.

According to her remarks, the fee—approximately $60 every three years—is described as administrative in nature. However, Parise challenged that characterization, arguing that communication from the township is limited and questioning how the funds are being used. She expressed concern that residents who are complying with maintenance requirements are being charged, while others who may not be maintaining their systems are not subject to the same oversight. 

Parise also raised broader concerns about enforcement, suggesting the township should focus on properties that are not properly maintaining septic systems, particularly given potential environmental and public health risks.

In addition, she questioned recent billing practices, stating that she received what she believed to be an incorrect invoice and indicating she would withhold payment until further clarification is provided.

In response, Health Officer Devangi Patel explained that some septic systems were previously exempted from the program under an earlier ordinance. These systems were “grandfathered” and are only brought into the program upon a property sale, alteration, or repair.

Officials acknowledged that identifying all exempt properties may be difficult, as a comprehensive list is not currently maintained. Board members suggested that reviewing the ordinance and determining the scope of those exemptions may be warranted.

No formal action was taken during the meeting.

Photo Credit: Nicholas Mistretta/headlinenewsmontgomery.com